Volume 5, Issue 4, August 2017, Page: 63-69
Game Analysis of Knowledge Transfer of Product Innovation Team in Multinational Corporations
Luo Ling, School of Management, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, China
Wang Juan-ru, School of Management, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, China
Received: Aug. 29, 2017;       Accepted: Sep. 9, 2017;       Published: Sep. 29, 2017
DOI: 10.11648/j.jhrm.20170504.12      View  2512      Downloads  205
Abstract
Product innovation team is a knowledge-intensive organization, which can integrate the dominant resources effectively in order to creative competive advantage for multinational corporations. Knowledge sharing is the key to success for product innovation team. This paper proposes a game theoric model that can indicate team members’ collaboration on a product innovation through knowledge sharing. In addition, knowledge-sharing activities in three types of product innovation team are analyzed. The proposed model indentifies conditions that lead to collaboration among team members in the product innovation team, which maximizes product performance. The insights obtained from the model and possible implications in product innovation team are discussed.
Keywords
Knowledge Sharing, Product Innovation Team, Game Theory, Incentive Mechanism
To cite this article
Luo Ling, Wang Juan-ru, Game Analysis of Knowledge Transfer of Product Innovation Team in Multinational Corporations, Journal of Human Resource Management. Vol. 5, No. 4, 2017, pp. 63-69. doi: 10.11648/j.jhrm.20170504.12
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Tamer Cavusgil S, Calantone R J, Zhao Y. Tacit knowledge transfer and firm innovation capability [J]. Journal of business & industrial marketing, 2003, 18(1): 6-21.
[2]
Sarin S, McDermott C. The effect of team leader characteristics on learning, knowledge application, and performance of cross-functional new product development teams [J]. Decision sciences, 2003, 34(4): 707-739.
[3]
Liao Y, Barnes J. Knowledge acquisition and product innovation flexibility in SMEs [J]. Business Process Management Journal, 2015, 21(6): 1257-1278.
[4]
Xu S. Balancing the Two Knowledge Dimensions in Innovation Efforts: An Empirical Examination among Pharmaceutical Firms [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2015, 32(4): 610-621.
[5]
Knudsen M P. The relative importance of interfirm relationships and knowledge transfer for new product development success [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2007, 24(2): 117-138.
[6]
Hargadon A, Sutton R I. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm [J]. Administrative science quarterly, 1997: 716-749.
[7]
Choi H S, Thompson L. Old wine in a new bottle: Impact of membership change on group creativity [J]. Organizational Behavior and human decision processes, 2005, 98(2): 121-132.
[8]
Li Y M, Jhang-Li J H. Knowledge sharing in communities of practice: A game theoretic analysis [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 207(2): 1052-1064.
[9]
Dyer J H, Nobeoka K. Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: the Toyota case [J]. Strategic management journal, 2000, 21(3): 345-367.
[10]
Ba S, Stallaert J, Whinston A B. Research commentary: introducing a third dimension in information systems design—the case for incentive alignment [J]. Information systems research, 2001, 12(3): 225-239.
[11]
Ba S, Stallaert J, Whinston A. Optimal Investment in Knowledge Within a Firm Using a Market Mechanism [J]. Management Science, 2001, 47(9): 1203-1219.
[12]
Bartol K M, Srivastava A. Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organizational reward systems [J]. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 2002, 9(1): 64-76.
[13]
Ho S P, Wu P C, Hsu Y. Knowledge sharing model and its implication on knowledge categorization and management [C]//Proceedings of the 23rd International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC). 2006: 751-756.
[14]
Ardichvili A, Page V, Wentling T. Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice [J]. Journal of knowledge management, 2003, 7(1): 64-77.
[15]
Shih M H, Tsai H T, Wu C C, et al. A holistic knowledge sharing framework in high-tech firms: game and co-opetition perspectives [J]. International Journal of Technology Management, 2006, 36(4): 354-367.
[16]
Bandyopadhyay S, Pathak P. Knowledge sharing and cooperation in outsourcing projects—A game theoretic analysis [J]. Decision Support Systems, 2007, 43(2): 349-358.
[17]
Samieh H M, Wahba K. Knowledge sharing behavior from game theory and socio-psychology perspectives [C]//System Sciences, 2007. HICSS 2007. 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on. IEEE, 2007: 187c-187c.
[18]
Song X, Li J, Xu N. Dynamic game analysis on knowledge-sharing and knowledge-spillover in competitive alliances [C]. In: Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, 2008: 783-786.
[19]
Sharma R, Bhattacharya S. Knowledge dilemmas within organizations: Resolutions from game theory [J]. Knowledge Based Systems, 2013, 45(7): 100-113.
[20]
Jiang G, Ma F, Shang J. Evolution of knowledge sharing behavior in social commerce: An agent-based computational approach [J]. Information Sciences, 2014, 278(10): 250-266.
[21]
Lin L, Geng X, Whinston A B. A sender-receiver framework for knowledge transfer [J]. Mis quarterly, 2005, 29(2): 197-219.
Browse journals by subject